GeForce GTX 950M vs Titan X Pascal

Place in the ranking	158	565
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.85	no data
Power efficiency	9.33	6.16
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GP102	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	2 August 2016 (8 years ago)	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	640
Core clock speed	1417 MHz	914 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	1124 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	44.96
Floating-point processing power	10.97 TFLOPS	1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	16
TMUs	224	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	DDR3 or GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1251 MHz	1000 or 2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	32 or 80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
VGA аnalog display support	no data	+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	+
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	-	+
GeForce ShadowPlay	-	+
GPU Boost	no data	2.0
GameWorks	-	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
BatteryBoost	-	+
Ansel	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.88
+405%

GTX 950M 6.71

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+405%

GTX 950M 2581

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+724%

GTX 950M 4367

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+543%

GTX 950M 15710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Titan X Pascal 27349
+755%

GTX 950M 3200

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 136891
+541%

GTX 950M 21356

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 514513
+159%

GTX 950M 198867

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	126 +334%	29 −334%
1440p	74 +252%	21 −252%
4K	58 +263%	16 −263%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.52	no data
1440p	16.20	no data
4K	20.67	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	92 +557%	14−16 −557%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +508%	12−14 −508%
Elden Ring	116 +544%	18−20 −544%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +300%	18 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	74 +429%	14−16 −429%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +477%	12−14 −477%
Forza Horizon 4	251 +830%	27−30 −830%
Metro Exodus	150 +582%	22 −582%
Red Dead Redemption 2	125 +160%	48 −160%
Valorant	212 +910%	21−24 −910%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	168 +700%	21−24 −700%
Counter-Strike 2	63 +350%	14−16 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Dota 2	191 +403%	38 −403%
Elden Ring	145 +706%	18−20 −706%
Far Cry 5	146 +387%	30−33 −387%
Fortnite	150−160 +417%	30 −417%
Forza Horizon 4	194 +619%	27−30 −619%
Grand Theft Auto V	160 +700%	20 −700%
Metro Exodus	106 +960%	10 −960%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	250 +355%	55 −355%
Red Dead Redemption 2	58 +205%	18−20 −205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +480%	20 −480%
Valorant	117 +457%	21−24 −457%
World of Tanks	270−280 +165%	100−110 −165%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	64 +327%	15 −327%
Counter-Strike 2	55 +293%	14−16 −293%
Cyberpunk 2077	55 +323%	12−14 −323%
Dota 2	232 +246%	67 −246%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +246%	26 −246%
Forza Horizon 4	167 +519%	27−30 −519%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	146 +759%	17 −759%
Valorant	181 +762%	21−24 −762%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	103 +1371%	7−8 −1371%
Elden Ring	84 +950%	8−9 −950%
Grand Theft Auto V	103 +1371%	7−8 −1371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +361%	35−40 −361%
Red Dead Redemption 2	37 +640%	5−6 −640%
World of Tanks	210−220 +352%	45−50 −352%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%
Counter-Strike 2	34 +278%	9−10 −278%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +620%	5−6 −620%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +463%	19 −463%
Forza Horizon 4	122 +917%	12−14 −917%
Metro Exodus	101 +1022%	9−10 −1022%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
Valorant	110 +547%	16−18 −547%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35	0−1
Dota 2	99 +450%	18−20 −450%
Elden Ring	44 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +482%	16−18 −482%
Metro Exodus	36 +1700%	2−3 −1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	114 +500%	18−20 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +500%	4−5 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	99 +482%	16−18 −482%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +783%	6−7 −783%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +750%	2−3 −750%
Dota 2	160 +789%	18−20 −789%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +433%	9 −433%
Fortnite	67 +1017%	6−7 −1017%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +900%	7−8 −900%
Valorant	58 +867%	6−7 −867%

This is how Titan X Pascal and GTX 950M compete in popular games:

Titan X Pascal is 334% faster in 1080p
Titan X Pascal is 252% faster in 1440p
Titan X Pascal is 263% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Titan X Pascal surpassed GTX 950M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.88	6.71
Recency	2 August 2016	13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 404.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 950M, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 950M in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.