Radeon HD 8210E vs Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.87
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGV100Kalindi
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 June 2017 (7 years ago)23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120128
Core clock speed1312 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1530 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate489.62.400
Floating-point processing power15.67 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs1284
TMUs3208
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed876 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth897.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2017 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 9 Watt

Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8210E, on the other hand, has 2677.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is a workstation card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.