RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Tesla V100 DGXS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated29
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.43
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV100AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51206144
Core clock speed1297 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1530 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate489.6417.6
Floating-point processing power15.67 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs12880
TMUs320192
Tensor Cores640192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB20 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed876 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth897.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.08.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2018 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 130 Watt

Tesla V100 DGXS has a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 DGXS and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS
Tesla V100 DGXS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Tesla V100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.