Quadro P4000 vs Tesla T10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla T10 and Quadro P4000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tesla T10
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
30.47
+17.8%

Tesla T10 outperforms P4000 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.92
Power efficiency9.2819.50
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU102GP104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release dateno data6 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$815

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081792
Core clock speedno data1202 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate449.3165.8
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS5.304 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs288112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed13 GB/s1901 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA7.56.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla T10 30.47
+17.8%
Quadro P4000 25.86
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla T10 13613
+17.8%
Quadro P4000 11554

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+17.6%
68
−17.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data11.99

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+0%
41
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Tesla T10 and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T10 is 18% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.47 25.86
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 100 Watt

Tesla T10 has a 17.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P4000, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Tesla T10 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla T10
Tesla T10
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Apple M2 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU Pro 19-Core GPU
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU Pro 16-Core GPU
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
PRO W7900 PRO W7900
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1060 6 GB
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Pro 5700 XT Pro 5700 XT
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
A100 PCIe A100 PCIe

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4
4 votes

Rate Tesla T10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
321 vote

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T10 or Quadro P4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.