Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs Tesla P4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking237not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.36no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGP104Rialto Bridge
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256020480
Core clock speed886 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate178.22,048
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs1601280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 800 Watt

Tesla P4 has 966.7% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max NEXT, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P4 and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation graphics card while Data Center GPU Max NEXT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4
Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 73 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 46 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.