Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Tesla P100 DGXS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.34
Power efficiencyno data10.55
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP100Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 April 2016 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843584
Core clock speed1328 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate331.5336.0
Floating-point processing power10.61 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs224224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2016 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 230 Watt

Tesla P100 DGXS has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P100 DGXS and Radeon Pro WX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.