Radeon R7 350 vs Tesla M60
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla M60 with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.
M60 outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 357 | 671 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.29 | 7.21 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 (10 years ago) | 6 July 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 ×2 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 ×2 | 25.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB ×2 | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit ×2 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s ×2 | 72 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.74 | 5.16 |
| Recency | 30 August 2015 | 6 July 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 55 Watt |
Tesla M60 has a 224.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
R7 350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 445.5% lower power consumption.
The Tesla M60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
