Quadro RTX 8200 vs Tesla M60

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking284not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.48no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM204GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date30 August 2015 (9 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20487552
Core clock speed557 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate150.8708.0
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs128472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 8200 has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M60 and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M60
Tesla M60
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.