ATI Radeon 7200 vs Tesla M6

Place in the ranking	333	1534
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.18	0.03
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	GM204	R100
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2015 (9 years ago)	1 April 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	930 MHz	166 MHz
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,200 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	113.3	1
Floating-point processing power	3.625 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	2
TMUs	96	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Width	MXM Module	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M6 16.31
+163000%

ATI 7200 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla M6 6284
+314100%

ATI 7200 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.31	0.01
Recency	30 August 2015	1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	23 Watt

Tesla M6 has a 163000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 334.8% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M6 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.