Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Tesla M40 24 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.49no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM200Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2015 (9 years ago)24 January 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724096
Core clock speed948 MHz2400 MHz
Boost clock speed1112 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate213.5760.3
Floating-point processing power6.832 TFLOPS24.33 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs192256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s624.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2015 24 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 260 Watt

Tesla M40 24 GB has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 4% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M40 24 GB and Radeon RX 9070 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M40 24 GB is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
Tesla M40 24 GB
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Tesla M40 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 55 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.