TITAN RTX vs Tesla M2090

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2090 with TITAN RTX, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2090
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.51

TITAN RTX outperforms Tesla M2090 by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.11
Power efficiency2.6111.98
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed651 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66509.8
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs64288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−437%
161
+437%
1440p18−20
−461%
101
+461%
4K12−14
−500%
72
+500%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.52
1440pno data24.74
4Kno data34.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+0%
104
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+0%
104
+0%
Battlefield 5 209
+0%
209
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 143
+0%
143
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 201
+0%
201
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 281
+0%
281
+0%
Hitman 3 117
+0%
117
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 348
+0%
348
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 206
+0%
206
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+0%
215
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 186
+0%
186
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+0%
88
+0%
Battlefield 5 203
+0%
203
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
+0%
131
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 154
+0%
154
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 254
+0%
254
+0%
Hitman 3 116
+0%
116
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 336
+0%
336
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 286
+0%
286
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 204
+0%
204
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+0%
79
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+0%
80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+0%
102
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+0%
175
+0%
Hitman 3 111
+0%
111
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 218
+0%
218
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 242
+0%
242
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+0%
139
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 123
+0%
123
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+0%
66
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Hitman 3 100
+0%
100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
+0%
168
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
+0%
183
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 205
+0%
205
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+0%
119
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hitman 3 48
+0%
48
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 121
+0%
121
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+0%
52
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+0%
43
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+0%
50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 109
+0%
109
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+0%
43
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+0%
74
+0%

This is how Tesla M2090 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 437% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 461% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.51 48.95
Recency 25 July 2011 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 280 Watt

Tesla M2090 has 12% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 414.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 813 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.