HD Graphics 400 vs Tesla M2090

Place in the ranking	458	1079
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.79	13.82
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	GF110	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	96
Core clock speed	651 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	640 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.66	7.680
Floating-point processing power	1.332 TFLOPS	0.1229 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	2
TMUs	64	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	924 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	177.4 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80
CUDA	2.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.50	1.13
Recency	25 July 2011	1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	6 Watt

Tesla M2090 has a 740.7% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 4066.7% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 400 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.