GeForce 7300 GT vs Tesla M2090
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 458 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.71 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | G73 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 15 May 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $149.99 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 177 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 24 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 2.800 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.332 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | 8 |
| TMUs | 64 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 924 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 10.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2011 | 15 May 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 24 Watt |
Tesla M2090 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.
7300 GT, on the other hand, has 941.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla M2090 and GeForce 7300 GT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7300 GT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
