Radeon 620 vs Tesla M2075

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated850
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.23
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF110Polaris 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448384
Core clock speed574 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1424.58
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 50 Watt

Tesla M2075 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2075 and Radeon 620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2075 is a workstation card while Radeon 620 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.