Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK210Vega Mobile
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 24961792
Core clock speed562 MHzno data
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/secno data
ROPs2x 48no data
TMUs2x 208no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 90 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m
AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 321 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.