Radeon R5 A220 vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK210Caicos
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496160
Core clock speed562 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec6.200
ROPs2x 484
TMUs2x 2088

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla K80m has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

R5 A220, on the other hand, has 757% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 39 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Radeon R5 A220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.