Radeon PRO W6300 vs Tesla K80m

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.18
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK210Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496768
Core clock speed562 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec97.92
Floating-point processing powerno data3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4832
TMUs2x 20848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 25 Watt

PRO W6300 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon PRO W6300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.