Radeon 660M vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.82
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK210Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496384
Core clock speed562 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec45.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4816
TMUs2x 20824
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5012 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 493 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.