Quadro RTX 5000 vs Tesla K80m

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated96
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.36
Power efficiencyno data12.84
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK210TU104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (9 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 24963072
Core clock speed562 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1815 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec348.5
Floating-point processing powerno data11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4864
TMUs2x 208192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 13 August 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 230 Watt

RTX 5000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Quadro RTX 5000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 204 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.