ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs Tesla K20s

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK110RV730
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 February 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496320
Core clock speed575 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate119.619.20
Floating-point performance2.87 gflops0.384 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount5 GB512 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5200 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 February 2013 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 30 Watt

Tesla K20s has an age advantage of 3 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI E4690 MXM, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20s and Radeon E4690 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K20s is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E4690 MXM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20s
Tesla K20s
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
Radeon E4690 MXM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla K20s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E4690 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.