ATI FirePro V8800 vs Tesla K20c

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking487not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Power efficiency2.76no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK110Cypress
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)7 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 $1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24961600
Core clock speed706 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt208 Watt
Texture fill rate146.866.00
Floating-point processing power3.524 TFLOPS2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs20880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 7 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 208 Watt

Tesla K20c has an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V8800, on the other hand, has 8.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20c and FirePro V8800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 12 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.