CMP 170HX vs Tesla K20Xm

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency2.24no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK110GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26884480
Core clock speed732 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate164.0394.8
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs224280
Tensor Coresno data280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth249.6 GB/s1,493 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.58.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 250 Watt

Tesla K20Xm has 6.4% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20Xm and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Tesla K20Xm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.