Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Tegra 4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated78
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.78
Power efficiencyno data16.95
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 4Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed672 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2755 MHz
Number of transistors11 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate2.688352.6
Floating-point processing powerno data22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLES 3.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 190 Watt

Tegra 4 has 850% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 4 and Radeon RX 7600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 4
Tegra 4
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 462 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.