Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Tegra 3

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 3Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 November 2011 (13 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data19456
Core clock speed416 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed520 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors10 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1602,554
Floating-point processing powerno data81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs81216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared192 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLES 2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2011 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 750 Watt

Tegra 3 has 3650% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 3 and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 3 is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 3
Tegra 3
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Tegra 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 57 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.