Radeon RX 5300 vs Tegra 2 GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.62
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTegra 2Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 June 2010 (14 years ago)28 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1408
Core clock speed300 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2010 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 100 Watt

Tegra 2 GPU has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 5300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 2 GPU and Radeon RX 5300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 2 GPU
Tegra 2 GPU
AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.