Quadro 6000 vs TITAN Xp

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with Quadro 6000, including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
50.41
+623%

TITAN Xp outperforms 6000 by a whopping 623% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking59556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.890.16
Power efficiency13.822.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP102GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN Xp has 7956% better value for money than Quadro 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840448
Core clock speed1405 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt204 Watt
Texture fill rate379.732.14
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm248 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN Xp 50.41
+623%
Quadro 6000 6.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+623%
Quadro 6000 2685

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN Xp 72413
+635%
Quadro 6000 9850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.41 6.97
Recency 6 April 2017 10 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 204 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 623.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 6000, on the other hand, has 22.5% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while Quadro 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4668 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.