Radeon RX 6600 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6400 Radeon RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Radeon RX 6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.40
+13%

TITAN V outperforms RX 6600 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
RX 6600 RX 6600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80110
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.88
Power efficiency12.3820.76
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and RX 6600 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201792
Core clock speed1200 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2491 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6279.0
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320112
Tensor Cores640no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm190 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.40
+13%
RX 6600 39.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+13%
RX 6600 15161

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+5.3%
114
−5.3%
1440p152
+167%
57
−167%
4K82
+165%
31
−165%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.992.89
1440p19.735.77
4K36.5710.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
+0%
113
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 99
+0%
99
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 95
+0%
95
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 182
+0%
182
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hitman 3 86
+0%
86
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
+0%
142
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 157
+0%
157
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
+0%
58
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hitman 3 54
+0%
54
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 36
+0%
36
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 5% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 167% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 165% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.40 39.30
Recency 7 December 2017 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 132 Watt

TITAN V has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 89.4% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
A30 PCIe A30 PCIe
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
A10G A10G
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3284 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9332 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.