Radeon RX 580 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	81	246
Place by popularity	not in top-100	1
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	17.85
Power efficiency	12.27	8.56
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GV100	Polaris 20
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (7 years ago)	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and RX 580 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2304
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1257 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1340 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	185 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	193.0
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	6.175 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	32
TMUs	320	144
Tensor Cores	640	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	7.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.55
+93.6%

RX 580 23.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+93.6%

RX 580 8847

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	180−190 +87.5%	96 −87.5%
1440p	152 +245%	44 −245%
4K	82 +116%	38 −116%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	16.66 −598%	2.39 +598%
1440p	19.73 −279%	5.20 +279%
4K	36.57 −507%	6.03 +507%

RX 580 has 598% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 580 has 279% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 580 has 507% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Elden Ring	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	83 +0%	83 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	117 +0%	117 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	51 +0%	51 +0%
Elden Ring	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Fortnite	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 +0%	77 +0%
Metro Exodus	57 +0%	57 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	202 +0%	202 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	68 +0%	68 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70 +0%	70 +0%
Valorant	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Elden Ring	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
World of Tanks	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	53 +0%	53 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Dota 2	57 +0%	57 +0%
Elden Ring	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	57 +0%	57 +0%
Metro Exodus	18 +0%	18 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	73 +0%	73 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +0%	57 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	28 +0%	28 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Fortnite	31 +0%	31 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

This is how TITAN V and RX 580 compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 88% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 245% faster in 1440p
TITAN V is 116% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	44.55	23.01
Recency	7 December 2017	18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	185 Watt

TITAN V has a 93.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

RX 580, on the other hand, has 35.1% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.