Radeon RX 470 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	111	317
Place by popularity	not in top-100	68
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.10	15.70
Power efficiency	12.61	12.42
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GV100	Ellesmere
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	4 August 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 470 has 283% better value for money than TITAN V.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2048
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	926 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1206 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	154.4
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	4.94 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	32
TMUs	320	128
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	512 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	211.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	7.0	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.95
+112%

RX 470 19.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+112%

Samples: 138

RX 470 8096

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140−150 +103%	69 −103%
1440p	152 +300%	38 −300%
4K	82 +122%	37 −122%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	21.42 −726%	2.59 +726%
1440p	19.73 −319%	4.71 +319%
4K	36.57 −656%	4.84 +656%

RX 470 has 726% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 470 has 319% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 470 has 656% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	71 +0%	71 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Fortnite	88 +0%	88 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	73 +0%	73 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50 +0%	50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70 +0%	70 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry 5	61 +0%	61 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40 +0%	40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40 +0%	40 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 +0%	33 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	43 +0%	43 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 +0%	33 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	86 +0%	86 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX 470 compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 103% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 300% faster in 1440p
TITAN V is 122% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.95	19.36
Recency	7 December 2017	4 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	120 Watt

TITAN V has a 112% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

RX 470, on the other hand, has 108% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 in performance tests.