Radeon Pro W6600 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Radeon Pro W6600, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.38
+9.8%

TITAN V outperforms Pro W6600 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8098
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.30
Power efficiency12.2927.99
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and Pro W6600 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201792
Core clock speed1200 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2903 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6325.1
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320112
Tensor Cores640no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.38
+9.8%
Pro W6600 40.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+9.8%
Pro W6600 15596

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p152
+16.9%
130−140
−16.9%
4K82
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%

Cost per frame, $

1440p19.734.99
4K36.579.27

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.38 40.42
Recency 7 December 2017 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

TITAN V has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN V and Radeon Pro W6600.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon Pro W6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3282 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 64 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.