Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU vs TITAN V

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.18no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameGV100no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512019
Core clock speed1200 MHz444 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1398 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6no data
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs320no data
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width3072 Bitno data
Memory clock speed848 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 17 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 20 Watt

Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3285 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 133 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.