Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics vs TITAN V CEO Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking84not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGV100Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)28 January 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120128
Core clock speed1200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz655 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate465.64.800
Floating-point performance14.9 gflops0.1536 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1696 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2018 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

TITAN V CEO Edition has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

R3 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V CEO Edition and Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop card while Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 41 vote

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.