RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs T600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T600 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T600
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
16.80

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms T600 by a whopping 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking32315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.14
Power efficiency28.7817.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117AD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64018176
Core clock speed735 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate53.401,423
Floating-point processing power1.709 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs40568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 16.80
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.76
+345%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 6471
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28801
+345%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 8694
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+715%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T600 344838
+173%
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 6552
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+460%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

T600 27828
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 322743
+1060%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

T600 25964
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 246891
+851%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
−242%
181
+242%
1440p25
−580%
170
+580%
4K20
−490%
118
+490%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.56
1440pno data39.99
4Kno data57.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−371%
130−140
+371%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−327%
230−240
+327%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−200%
110−120
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−126%
240−250
+126%
Hitman 3 30−35
−303%
120−130
+303%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−218%
260−270
+218%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−172%
150−160
+172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−467%
300−350
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−84.3%
150−160
+84.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−371%
130−140
+371%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−327%
230−240
+327%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−200%
110−120
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−126%
240−250
+126%
Hitman 3 30−35
−303%
120−130
+303%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−218%
260−270
+218%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−172%
150−160
+172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
−512%
300−350
+512%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−308%
150−160
+308%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−84.3%
150−160
+84.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−371%
130−140
+371%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−200%
110−120
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−126%
240−250
+126%
Hitman 3 30−35
−303%
120−130
+303%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
−577%
260−270
+577%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
−593%
300−350
+593%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−863%
260
+863%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−84.3%
150−160
+84.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−419%
160−170
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−331%
110−120
+331%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−412%
85−90
+412%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−571%
90−95
+571%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−356%
80−85
+356%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−342%
80−85
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−201%
270−280
+201%
Hitman 3 20−22
−435%
100−110
+435%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−600%
180−190
+600%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−230%
99
+230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−563%
210−220
+563%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1117%
219
+1117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−135%
240−250
+135%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−321%
110−120
+321%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−475%
65−70
+475%
Hitman 3 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−2.4%
87
+2.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−600%
110−120
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−1050%
184
+1050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−510%
60−65
+510%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−638%
55−60
+638%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−478%
50−55
+478%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−474%
130−140
+474%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−556%
110−120
+556%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−447%
80−85
+447%

This is how T600 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 242% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 580% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 490% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1117% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 6000 Ada Generation surpassed T600 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.80 74.76
Recency 6 May 2021 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 300 Watt

T600 has 650% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 345% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the T600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T600
T600
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 682 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 85 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.