Radeon RX 7600 XT vs T1000

Place in the ranking	296	84
Place by popularity	not in top-100	91
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	77.69
Power efficiency	27.12	16.12
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 33
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2048
Core clock speed	1065 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1395 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.12	352.6
Floating-point processing power	2.5 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	56	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	156 mm	204 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 17.06

RX 7600 XT 38.50
+126%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7624

RX 7600 XT 17204
+126%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−111%

120−130
+111%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

2.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −117%	230−240 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −121%	170−180 +121%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −117%	230−240 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry 5	62 −110%	130−140 +110%
Fortnite	95−100 −122%	220−230 +122%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −124%	170−180 +124%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −120%	130−140 +120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −114%	150−160 +114%
Valorant	140−150 −114%	300−310 +114%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −121%	170−180 +121%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −117%	230−240 +117%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230 −120%	500−550 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry 5	57 −111%	120−130 +111%
Fortnite	95−100 −122%	220−230 +122%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −124%	170−180 +124%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −120%	130−140 +120%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 −121%	170−180 +121%
Metro Exodus	35 −114%	75−80 +114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −114%	150−160 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 −119%	140−150 +119%
Valorant	140−150 −114%	300−310 +114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −121%	170−180 +121%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Far Cry 5	53 −108%	110−120 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −124%	170−180 +124%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −114%	150−160 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 −114%	75−80 +114%
Valorant	140−150 −114%	300−310 +114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

95−100
−122%

220−230

+122%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −118%	85−90 +118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 −122%	300−310 +122%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −119%	70−75 +119%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −107%	350−400 +107%
Valorant	170−180 −97.7%	350−400 +97.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −108%	110−120 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −114%	90−95 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −113%	100−105 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −117%	65−70 +117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

40−45

−121%

95−100
+121%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −121%	75−80 +121%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −122%	60−65 +122%
Valorant	100−110 −119%	230−240 +119%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −114%	60−65 +114%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

18−20

−111%

40−45
+111%

This is how T1000 and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600 XT is 111% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.06	38.50
Recency	6 May 2021	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	190 Watt

T1000 has 280% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 125.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.