Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics vs STG

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV1Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 1995 (30 years ago)28 January 2015 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed75 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors1 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.082.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed50 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 500 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

STG has 650% lower power consumption.

R2E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG and Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG
STG
AMD Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about STG or Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.