Radeon Graphics 384SP vs STG

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV1Cezanne
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed75 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors1 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0840.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed50 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 500 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 45 Watt

STG has 2150% lower power consumption.

Graphics 384SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 25 years, and a 7042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG
STG
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 20 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.