Quadro K6000 SDI vs Riva TNT2 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV5 B6GK110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 1999 (25 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2880
Core clock speed143 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors15 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data239 Watt
Texture fill rate0.29216.5
Floating-point processing powerno data5.196 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed167 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.672 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 1999 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

K6000 SDI has an age advantage of 13 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 PRO and Quadro K6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 PRO is a desktop card while Quadro K6000 SDI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 PRO
Riva TNT2 PRO
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
Quadro K6000 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.