Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated450
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNV5 B6Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 March 1999 (25 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed100 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors15 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate0.2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount16 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed133 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.064 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012_2
OpenGL1.2no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 1999 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 250 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 24 years, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 25 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.