Radeon RX 7900 XT vs ATI Xpress 200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 200M
2005
0.05

7900 XT outperforms 200M by a whopping 138580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.32
Power efficiencyno data17.80
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameRC410Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (21 years ago)3 November 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores65376
Core clock speed336 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz2394 MHz
Number of transistors107 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.67804.4
Floating-point processing powerno data51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs2192
TMUs2336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L0 Cacheno data2.6 MB
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 200M 0.05
RX 7900 XT 69.34
+138580%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 200M 22
Samples: 25
RX 7900 XT 29055
+131968%
Samples: 6673

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1199
1440p-0−1135
4K-0−185

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.52
1440pno data6.66
4Kno data10.58

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 237

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 212
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−13950%
280−290
+13950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%
Valorant 24−27
−1604%
400−450
+1604%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−3000%
270−280
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 190
Dota 2 7−8
−2743%
199
+2743%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−13950%
280−290
+13950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−11975%
483
+11975%
Valorant 24−27
−1604%
400−450
+1604%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 179
Dota 2 7−8
−2529%
184
+2529%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−13950%
280−290
+13950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6275%
255
+6275%
Valorant 24−27
−1604%
400−450
+1604%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−10200%
206
+10200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−17400%
170−180
+17400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−24500%
240−250
+24500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−17800%
179
+17800%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1150%
175
+1150%
Valorant 0−1 300−350

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−9500%
95−100
+9500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−7800%
75−80
+7800%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 307
+0%
307
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 288
+0%
288
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 244
+0%
244
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 268
+0%
268
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 223
+0%
223
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+0%
159
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 24500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT performs better in 21 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 69.34
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 XT has a 138580% higher aggregate performance score, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 47 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2632 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 200M or Radeon RX 7900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.