GeForce GT 415 OEM vs ATI Radeon X800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.51no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR430GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2004 (20 years ago)3 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed400 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors160 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80010.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1306 TFLOPS
ROPs128
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s10.66 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2004 3 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 32 Watt

ATI X800 has 6.7% lower power consumption.

GT 415 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 and GeForce GT 415 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
GeForce GT 415 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GT 415 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.