ION vs ATI Radeon X800 XL

Place in the ranking	1402	1376
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.25	0.75
Architecture	R400 (2004−2008)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	R430	C7A-ION
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2004 (20 years ago)	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	16
Core clock speed	400 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	160 million	282 million
Manufacturing process technology	110 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.400	3.600
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCI
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	490 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	31.36 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0b (9_2)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	no data	4.0
OpenGL	2.0	3.3
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X800 XL 0.18

ION 0.22
+22.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X800 XL 69

ION 84
+21.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.18	0.22
Recency	1 December 2004	3 June 2008
Chip lithography	110 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	20 Watt

ION has a 22.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 69.2% more advanced lithography process, and 145% lower power consumption.

The ION is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 XL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X800 XL is a desktop card while ION is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.