Radeon RX Vega 9 vs ATI X300 SE HyperMemory

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.03
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV370Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2006 (19 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data576
Core clock speed325 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.300no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount128 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed300 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012_1
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2006 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 686% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.