Radeon Pro 5700 vs ATI X300 SE HyperMemory

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated235
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.22
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRV370Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2006 (19 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed325 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors107 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate1.300194.4
Floating-point processing powerno data6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2006 4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 130 Watt

ATI X300 SE HyperMemory has 333% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory and Radeon Pro 5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory or Radeon Pro 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.