NVS 5400M vs ATI Radeon X1900 XTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated956
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.23
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameR580GF108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date24 January 2006 (18 years ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed650 MHz660 MHz
Number of transistors384 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate10.4010.56
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed775 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth49.6 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 January 2006 1 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 35 Watt

NVS 5400M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1900 XTX and NVS 5400M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1900 XTX is a desktop card while NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1900 XTX
Radeon X1900 XTX
NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon X1900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.