Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X1650 PRO with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI X1650 PRO
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 44 Watt
0.22
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.31
+12314%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms ATI X1650 PRO by a whopping 12314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1374202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3453.47
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV530AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2007 (17 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed600 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors157 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 27.31
Recency 1 February 2007 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 12313.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 25.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 PRO is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.