GeForce FX 5900 XT vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1375not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.34no data
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRV530NV35
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2007 (17 years ago)12 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors157 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.4003.200
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2007 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

ATI X1650 PRO has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has 25.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 PRO and GeForce FX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 XT
GeForce FX 5900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.