GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X1600 XT with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI X1600 XT
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 42 Watt
0.29

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms ATI X1600 XT by a whopping 13128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1336115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.4918.17
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV530TU104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed590 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors157 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.360299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed690 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.08 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−13500%
136
+13500%
1440p0−194
4K0−167

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 265
+0%
265
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 116
+0%
116
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Valorant 216
+0%
216
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 217
+0%
217
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 127
+0%
127
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 162
+0%
162
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+0%
97
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 89
+0%
89
+0%

This is how ATI X1600 XT and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 13500% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 38.36
Recency 1 October 2007 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 150 Watt

ATI X1600 XT has 257.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 13127.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 XT is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Radeon X1600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 44 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 133 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.