GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon Vega 3 Efficient

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated2
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.33
Power efficiencyno data15.96
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRavenAD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 May 2018 (6 years ago)28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19214592
Core clock speed300 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt425 Watt
Texture fill rate12.001,149
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs12456
Tensor Coresno data456
Ray Tracing Coresno data114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,008 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 May 2018 28 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 425 Watt

Vega 3 Efficient has 2733.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 3 Efficient and GeForce RTX 4090 D. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 44 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 80 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.