Quadro K2200 vs Radeon VII

Place in the ranking	93	482
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.80	3.62
Power efficiency	9.95	9.35
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Vega 20	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 February 2019 (6 years ago)	22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$395.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Radeon VII has 585% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	640
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	1124 MHz
Number of transistors	13,230 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	68 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.0	44.96
Floating-point processing power	13.44 TFLOPS	1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	240	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	280 mm	202 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1024 GB/s	80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+
CUDA	-	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon VII 42.73
+361%

Quadro K2200 9.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16465
+361%

Quadro K2200 3568

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	125 +363%	27−30 −363%
1440p	81 +406%	16−18 −406%
4K	60 +400%	12−14 −400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.59 +162%	14.66 −162%
1440p	8.63 +187%	24.73 −187%
4K	11.65 +183%	32.98 −183%

Radeon VII has 162% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Radeon VII has 187% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Radeon VII has 183% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	120−130 +400%	24−27 −400%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +411%	18−20 −411%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +417%	18−20 −417%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	120−130 +400%	24−27 −400%
Battlefield 5	136 +404%	27−30 −404%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +411%	18−20 −411%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +417%	18−20 −417%
Far Cry 5	99 +371%	21−24 −371%
Fortnite	195 +388%	40−45 −388%
Forza Horizon 4	163 +366%	35−40 −366%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +388%	24−27 −388%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	157 +423%	30−33 −423%
Valorant	220−230 +409%	45−50 −409%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	120−130 +400%	24−27 −400%
Battlefield 5	137 +407%	27−30 −407%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +411%	18−20 −411%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +363%	60−65 −363%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +417%	18−20 −417%
Dota 2	160 +433%	30−33 −433%
Far Cry 5	95 +428%	18−20 −428%
Fortnite	154 +413%	30−33 −413%
Forza Horizon 4	157 +423%	30−33 −423%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +388%	24−27 −388%
Grand Theft Auto V	111 +363%	24−27 −363%
Metro Exodus	88 +389%	18−20 −389%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	158 +427%	30−33 −427%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 +363%	30−33 −363%
Valorant	220−230 +409%	45−50 −409%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	127 +370%	27−30 −370%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +411%	18−20 −411%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +417%	18−20 −417%
Dota 2	147 +390%	30−33 −390%
Far Cry 5	91 +406%	18−20 −406%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +381%	27−30 −381%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +388%	24−27 −388%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	143 +377%	30−33 −377%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +369%	16−18 −369%
Valorant	197 +393%	40−45 −393%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

114

+375%

24−27
−375%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +395%	55−60 −395%
Grand Theft Auto V	43 +378%	9−10 −378%
Metro Exodus	56 +367%	12−14 −367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +400%	35−40 −400%
Valorant	260−270 +373%	55−60 −373%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +381%	21−24 −381%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +370%	10−11 −370%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +428%	18−20 −428%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +375%	24−27 −375%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +369%	16−18 −369%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

100−110

+400%

21−24
−400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +417%	12−14 −417%
Metro Exodus	37 +363%	8−9 −363%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +440%	10−11 −440%
Valorant	240−250 +382%	50−55 −382%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	73 +421%	14−16 −421%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Dota 2	78 +388%	16−18 −388%
Far Cry 5	59 +392%	12−14 −392%
Forza Horizon 4	77 +381%	16−18 −381%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +389%	9−10 −389%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	58 +383%	12−14 −383%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

+389%

9−10
−389%

This is how Radeon VII and Quadro K2200 compete in popular games:

Radeon VII is 363% faster in 1080p
Radeon VII is 406% faster in 1440p
Radeon VII is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.73	9.26
Recency	7 February 2019	22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	68 Watt

Radeon VII has a 361.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K2200, on the other hand, has 333.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while Quadro K2200 is a workstation one.