RTX A5500 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated77
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.84
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega MobileGA103
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17927424
Core clock speedno data975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rateno data348.0
Floating-point processing powerno data22.27 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 165 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has 83.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A5500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Mobile and RTX A5500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A5500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 301 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 14 votes

Rate RTX A5500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.